<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A New Way to Think About Google Broad Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tsatkin.com/a-new-way-to-think-about-google-broad-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tsatkin.com/a-new-way-to-think-about-google-broad-search/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Online Marketing and Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:50:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Tsatkin</title>
		<link>http://www.tsatkin.com/a-new-way-to-think-about-google-broad-search/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Tsatkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 16:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tsatkin.com/a-new-way-to-think-about-google-broad-search/#comment-159</guid>
		<description>@ Zania

Vista would have no effect on search results on Google. I have experienced this with both Vista and XP. (Vista does blow has cost me hundreds of hours)

It doesn&#039;t work for all search combinations, but for logical combinations it does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Zania</p>
<p>Vista would have no effect on search results on Google. I have experienced this with both Vista and XP. (Vista does blow has cost me hundreds of hours)</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t work for all search combinations, but for logical combinations it does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zania</title>
		<link>http://www.tsatkin.com/a-new-way-to-think-about-google-broad-search/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>zania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 04:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tsatkin.com/a-new-way-to-think-about-google-broad-search/#comment-158</guid>
		<description>Interesting idea and it may work with some search terms. But I tried it out by searching &#039;animals&#039; and then &#039;photography&#039;, but nothing came up in the second search for animals or animal photography (apart from an end of 1st page link for National Geographic).  
I have read somewhere (can&#039;t remember where)that it depends which pc system you are using.  Evidently windows vista has a habit of trying to &#039;help you&#039; by remembering your previous searches, while XP does not. Could well be wrong though. (By the way, I use XP - refuse to even contemplate vista).  If this is the case, then  it would be something to consider as more people move to vista.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting idea and it may work with some search terms. But I tried it out by searching &#8216;animals&#8217; and then &#8216;photography&#8217;, but nothing came up in the second search for animals or animal photography (apart from an end of 1st page link for National Geographic).<br />
I have read somewhere (can&#8217;t remember where)that it depends which pc system you are using.  Evidently windows vista has a habit of trying to &#8216;help you&#8217; by remembering your previous searches, while XP does not. Could well be wrong though. (By the way, I use XP &#8211; refuse to even contemplate vista).  If this is the case, then  it would be something to consider as more people move to vista.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
